John Fisher is usually
associated with Erasmus, Thomas More and other Renaissance humanists. His life,
therefore, did not have the external simplicity found in the lives of some
saints. Rather, he was a man of learning, associated with the intellectuals and
political leaders of his day. He was interested in the contemporary culture and
eventually became chancellor at Cambridge. He had been made a bishop at 35, and
one of his interests was raising the standard of preaching in England. Fisher
himself was an accomplished preacher and writer. His sermons on the penitential
psalms were reprinted seven times before his death. With the coming of
Lutheranism, he was drawn into controversy. His eight books against heresy gave
him a leading position among European theologians.
In 1521 he was asked to
study the question of Henry VIII’s marriage. He incurred Henry’s anger by
defending the validity of the king’s marriage with Catherine of Aragon and
later by rejecting Henry’s claim to be the supreme head of the Church of England.
In an attempt to be rid
of him, Henry first had him accused of not reporting all the “revelations” of
the nun of Kent, Elizabeth Barton. John was summoned, in feeble health, to take
the oath to the new Act of Succession. He and Thomas More refused because the
Act presumed the legality of Henry’s divorce and his claim to be head of the
English Church. They were sent to the Tower of London, where Fisher remained 14
months without trial. They were finally sentenced to life imprisonment and loss
of goods.
When the two were called
to further interrogations, they remained silent. Fisher was tricked, on the
supposition he was speaking privately as a priest, and declared again that the
king was not supreme head. The king, further angered that the pope had made
John Fisher a cardinal, had him brought to trial on the charge of high treason.
He was condemned and executed, his body left to lie all day on the scaffold and
his head hung on London Bridge. More was executed two weeks later.
COMMENT:
Today many questions are raised about Christians' and priests' active involvement in social issues. John Fisher remained faithful to his calling as a bishop. He strongly upheld the teachings of the Church; the very cause of his martyrdom was his loyalty to Rome. He was involved in the cultural enrichment circles as well as in the political struggles of his time. This involvement caused him to question the moral conduct of the leadership of his country. "The Church has the right, indeed the duty, to proclaim justice on the social, national and international level, and to denounce instances of injustice, when the fundamental rights of man and his very salvation demand it" (Justice in the World, 1971 Synod of Bishops).
Today many questions are raised about Christians' and priests' active involvement in social issues. John Fisher remained faithful to his calling as a bishop. He strongly upheld the teachings of the Church; the very cause of his martyrdom was his loyalty to Rome. He was involved in the cultural enrichment circles as well as in the political struggles of his time. This involvement caused him to question the moral conduct of the leadership of his country. "The Church has the right, indeed the duty, to proclaim justice on the social, national and international level, and to denounce instances of injustice, when the fundamental rights of man and his very salvation demand it" (Justice in the World, 1971 Synod of Bishops).
Erasmus said of John Fisher: "He is the one man at this time who is incomparable for uprightness of life, for learning and for greatness of soul."
No comments:
Post a Comment